I still remember Professor Bello’s words about privatisation, decentralisation, and deregulation as the true engines of efficiency. Looking at the power sector today, I am convinced state or regional grids could be one of those ideas whose time has come. Nigeria does not need to be trapped forever in the failures of one fragile national grid. It can explore a patchwork of successes, state by state, until reliable electricity becomes the rule rather than the exception.
Ever since 2021, when my then energy law don, Professor Tayo Bello (a man with three master’s degrees and two PhDs, by the way) introduced me to the gospel of privatisation, decentralisation, and deregulation as ways of unlocking efficiency where government control has failed, I have been fascinated with where these principles could apply in Nigeria.
|
|
I took that lesson beyond theory. Having worked in a power distribution company, I saw firsthand how efficiency can emerge when entities are allowed to operate outside the kind of bureaucracy and red tape that crippled the old NEPA or PHCN. Of course, the national grid remains too sensitive and too strategic to simply be handed over entirely to private operators. But perhaps there is a middle path: decentralising the grid itself.
Instead of one fragile national grid, why not state or even regional grids? Each with the authority to generate, transmit, and distribute power within its boundaries. The Electricity Act 2023 already created the opening for this by allowing states to license and regulate electricity. Decentralisation simply takes this further, giving Lagos, Kano, Rivers, Enugu, or even clusters of states the chance to build and run their own mini-grids, thereby reducing reliance on Abuja’s overstretched national backbone.
|
|
|
|---|
Why It Matters
A decentralised approach makes the system more resilient. Today, a fault in a single transmission line can trigger nationwide outages. With state or regional grids, a collapse in Kaduna does not plunge Enugu or Lagos into darkness.
It allows for specialisation. Lagos could double down on gas and solar, Kano on wind, Rivers on gas and hydro, Borno on renewables, etcetera. Each grid can develop an energy mix that suits its geography and economy.
It creates competition. States that can guarantee stable electricity will naturally attract more investment and industry. Those that lag behind will feel the pressure to reform.
How It Could Work
State or Regional Authorities: Each state, or a coalition of states, will establish its/their own grid authority responsible for licensing and oversight.
Private Investment: Independent power producers will build plants directly tied to state or regional grids, with tariffs set locally, rather than by federal fiat.
Weaker states do not have to go it alone. By forming regional grids, several states can pool their resources and spread the cost of building infrastructure. This approach would allow them to reach the economies of scale necessary to make the projects viable, while ensuring that no single state is left behind simply because it lacks financial muscle.
Interconnections: States with surplus power can sell this across state lines. For example, Rivers could sell to Abia, or Lagos could trade excess solar power to Ogun. The national grid could still exist, but only as an interconnector, not the sole lifeline.
Phased Rollout: Pilot projects in states with existing industrial demand (Lagos, Ogun, and Rivers) could set the standard before expanding nationwide.
It is not reinventing the wheel, really. In the United States, electricity is managed through regional transmission organisations, rather than one national grid. India’s states run their own electricity boards. Even South Africa is beginning to explore provincial and city-level grids as alternatives to Eskom’s overburdened central system.
Potential Challenges
A move toward decentralised state or regional grids would not be without serious challenges. One clear danger is unequal development. Wealthier states like Lagos or Rivers could quickly attract investors and build reliable grids, while poorer or conflict-affected states might struggle to keep up, deepening the inequality between Nigeria’s regions. There is also the risk of regulatory confusion. If every state designs its own framework, investors could face a patchwork of rules that create uncertainty and discourage capital inflows. Costs pose another hurdle. Transmission infrastructure is pretty expensive to build and maintain, and without careful planning, state budgets could be overwhelmed before projects even take off. Finally, there’s the political dimension, which cannot be ignored. A shift of control away from Abuja to the states would almost certainly face resistance from entrenched interests who benefit from the status quo, and in Nigeria, like every other developing country riddled with corruption, there’s unfortunately no shortage of those kinds of people.
So, what can be done?
Possible Antidotes
Inter-State Compacts
Weaker states do not have to go it alone. By forming regional grids, several states can pool their resources and spread the cost of building infrastructure. This approach would allow them to reach the economies of scale necessary to make the projects viable, while ensuring that no single state is left behind simply because it lacks financial muscle.
Federal Standards
Even in a decentralised system, the Federal Government would still have a role to play. Setting basic standards for grid operations, investor protections, and technical requirements would create a baseline of consistency across all states. This way, investors can enter multiple markets without facing a completely different set of rules in each state, while states still retain the flexibility to adapt to their local needs.
Every Nigerian knows the frustration of power failure. We have lived too long with promises of reform that never materialise. State grids offer a practical way to shift responsibility closer to home. Governors would no longer have excuses; their performance would be visible in kilowatts. Citizens could hold them directly accountable for light or darkness.
Targeted Subsidies
For states that are less developed or conflict-affected, initial support from the Federal Government could prevent them from being locked out of progress. Subsidies could be directed toward building the first phase of critical infrastructure, ensuring that every state, regardless of its wealth, has a starting point. Over time, these subsidies could taper off as states become more self-sufficient and attract their own investors.
Public-Private Partnerships
Financing large-scale electricity projects is capital-intensive, but the private sector has the capacity to bear much of that weight. Public-private partnerships could bring in private capita, while maintaining state oversight to safeguard transparency and accountability. Such arrangements also allow states to tap into the technical expertise of private operators, raising the odds of efficiency in a sector long plagued by mismanagement.
Why You Should Get Behind This
Every Nigerian knows the frustration of power failure. We have lived too long with promises of reform that never materialise. State grids offer a practical way to shift responsibility closer to home. Governors would no longer have excuses; their performance would be visible in kilowatts. Citizens could hold them directly accountable for light or darkness.
Imagine a Nigeria where Lagos runs uninterrupted power because it got its grid right, Rivers builds an industrial hub powered by gas, or Enugu lights up its economy with a small hydro station. These successes would pressure others to match them. Instead of waiting for one central solution, we would have 36 opportunities for progress.
Final Thoughts
Like many ideas, this one came to me on a hot afternoon in Lagos, sitting on the balcony for air while the power was out for hours, the result of yet another collapse of the national grid.
There may be more bottlenecks than I have thought of or have posited in this paper. Implementation may reveal complexities beyond the surface. But from my perspective, this does not seem like a bad idea at all.
I still remember Professor Bello’s words about privatisation, decentralisation, and deregulation as the true engines of efficiency. Looking at the power sector today, I am convinced state or regional grids could be one of those ideas whose time has come. Nigeria does not need to be trapped forever in the failures of one fragile national grid. It can explore a patchwork of successes, state by state, until reliable electricity becomes the rule rather than the exception.
Mide Alabi, a lawyer, writes from Lagos. He can be reached at [email protected]
