The Federal High Court in Lagos has ruled that the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) acted outside its statutory authority in dissolving the board and management of Union Bank of Nigeria Plc, declaring the January 2024 intervention unlawful.
Delivering judgement on Wednesday in a suit marked FHC/L/MISC/1377/2025, the judge, Chukwujekwu Aneke, held that CBN’s actions were ultra vires and not in compliance with the provisions of the Banks and Other Financial Institutions Act 2020 (BOFIA).
|
|
According to the court filings, Titan Trust Bank Limited, alongside Luxis International DMCC and Magna International DMCC, claimed to be the ultimate beneficial owners of Union Bank.
They challenged the CBN’s dissolution of the bank’s board, the appointment of a new management, and the initiation of a recapitalisation process that allegedly diluted their shareholding and excluded them from key decisions.
|
|
|
|---|
In his ruling, the judge nullified the entire regulatory intervention and granted other prayers in favour of the applicants.
He set aside the CBN’s public announcement dissolving the board and invalidated all actions taken by the regulator-appointed management.
The court also ordered the immediate reinstatement of the former board and management led by Farouk Gumel.
Stay Ahead with Premium Times
Follow us on Google News and never miss breaking stories, investigations, and in-depth reporting.
Add as a preferred source on Google
Mr Aneke further restrained the CBN and other respondents from exercising any powers over the bank’s governance, including restructuring its share capital or altering its ownership structure.
He also halted the ongoing recapitalisation process and investor selection programme initiated under the CBN-appointed board.
On the issue of fair hearing, the court held that the applicants’ fundamental rights were breached, noting that they were sanctioned without being given an opportunity to respond to allegations of regulatory infractions arising from a purported special examination of the bank.
The judge found that the applicants’ shareholding was reduced from 100 per cent to 40 per cent and that they were excluded from participating in the recapitalisation exercise without legal justification, describing the actions as indicative of bad faith.
Although the CBN had defended its intervention as part of its prudential oversight, citing severe financial distress at the bank, including a negative capital adequacy ratio, a capital shortfall exceeding N224 billion, and a high non-performing loan ratio.
But the court held that such regulatory powers must be exercised strictly within the confines of the law.
On jurisdiction, the court ruled that Section 51 of BOFIA does not shield the CBN from judicial review where it acts outside its statutory powers.
It also held that the actions of the CBN-appointed board were subject to review, describing them as agents of the apex bank.
The court dismissed procedural objections raised by the respondents, holding that the applicable rules of court were merely directory and not sufficient to defeat the suit.
Mr Aneke also found that the applicants suffered a “continuing injury,” noting that they were excluded from the bank’s management and decision-making processes between January 2024 and December 2025, during which significant corporate actions were undertaken.
On damages, the court acknowledged that the respondents admitted the applicants invested $190 million in the bank but declined to award additional claims in the absence of oral evidence.
Background
The dispute stemmed from the CBN’s January 2024 intervention, when it dissolved the boards and management of Union Bank, Keystone Bank and Polaris Bank over alleged regulatory breaches and corporate governance failures.
READ ALSO: Union Bank brings Fitfeb 2026 to a close with nationwide Healthwalks and celebrations
At the time, the apex bank cited provisions of BOFIA, referencing the bank’s non-compliance with licensing conditions, threats to its financial stability, its failure to adhere to regulatory directives, and its undercapitalisation, as justification for the intervention.
It subsequently appointed interim management to take over the affected institutions and initiated corrective measures, including recapitalisation and restructuring programmes.
The move was part of a broader pattern of regulatory interventions by the CBN in Nigeria’s banking sector.
In 2021, the regulator removed the board of First Bank of Nigeria Holdings Plc over governance concerns, while a similar action was taken against Skye Bank Plc in 2016 due to prudential breaches, with the bank’s licence later revoked and its operations transferred to Polaris Bank.
Under BOFIA, the CBN is empowered to intervene in troubled banks, including removing directors where a “grave situation” is identified.
Discover more from Premium Times Nigeria
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
More News
![Fct-Abuja City Gate [PHOTO CREDIT: Abuja on IG]](https://i0.wp.com/media.premiumtimesng.com/wp-content/files/2020/05/abuja-abuja-15892815380281.jpg?fit=608%2C405&ssl=1)
