Rite Foods Limited has once again resorted to legal action—this time targeting Mamuda Beverages Nigeria Limited over its Pop Power Energy Drink, alleging trademark infringement and imitation. This follows a familiar pattern: in 2021, Rite Foods filed a similar suit against NBC’s Predator Energy Drink, which the Federal High Court dismissed as baseless.
Such repeated lawsuits suggest a strategy of legal intimidation rather than fair market competition. Industry observers allege that Rite Foods appears threatened by rising competition and continues to use litigation to disrupt emerging players.
|
|
Mamuda Beverages Nigeria Limited, a proudly Nigerian company based in Kano, is widely respected for its ethical business standards and high-quality production. Its Pop Power Energy Drink has earned strong consumer praise for its energizing effect, attractive branding, and affordability.
Earlier, both companies reached a mutual 4-point settlement agreement, not as an admission of guilt by Mamuda, but as a good-faith resolution. The agreed terms included:
|
|
|
|---|
1. Cap Colour (Any colour may be used except Yellow) – Current Cap “Olive Green”
2. Border lines (Any colour may be used except Yellow) – Current border lines “White”
3. Description (Any word may be used except Classic) Current description “Original”
4. Bottle colour (Any colour may be used except Black or Gray) Current bottle colour “Olive Green”
Stay Ahead with Premium Times
Follow us on Google News and never miss breaking stories, investigations, and in-depth reporting.
Add as a preferred source on Google
Mamuda Beverages fully complied with the settlement, and packaging reviews confirm these conditions were met. Despite this, Rite Foods resumed legal attacks, even though clear differences exist between the two bottles in design and structure
“Mamuda Beverages will not be bullied,” a company spokesperson stated. “Pop Power stands on its own merit, and Nigerian consumers recognise that.”
Mamuda Beverages Nigeria Limited has full confidence in the Nigerian judicial system and trusts that the rule of law will prevail—affirming its rights and protecting fair competition.
This case raises a broader question: Should established brands be allowed to suppress competition? Or should innovation, consumer choice, and ethical entrepreneurship be encouraged?
Mamuda Beverages Nigeria Limited deserves respect—not harassment—for its professional conduct and contributions to Nigeria’s manufacturing sector.
Download scanned document here
Discover more from Premium Times Nigeria
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
More News
