Tribunal upholds Ekweremadu’s election

Deputy Senate President_Ike_Ekweremadu
Deputy Senate President_Ike_Ekweremadu

The State and National Assembly Elections Petitions Tribunal in Enugu has affirmed the election of Ike Ekweremadu of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), in the February 23 general elections.

Mr Ekweremadu, who represents Enugu West Senatorial District, was the deputy president of the senate until June.

In a unanimous judgement delivered on Monday, the tribunal dismissed the petition brought by Juliet Ibekaku-Nwagwu of the All Progressives Congress (APC), as lacking in merit.

The Chairman of the tribunal, Justice Haruna Kereng, while reading the judgment, said the petitioners completely failed to prove their allegations beyond reasonable doubt.

Mr Kereng said allegations of substantial non-compliance to the Electoral Act, thuggery, falsification of figures needed to be proven polling unit by polling unit.

He said the few polling unit witnesses brought by the petitioners failed to demonstrate to the tribunal how the election figures were falsified.

He said out of the 824 polling units, 81 wards and five local government areas in the state, the petitioners were only able to present 16 witnesses with most of them presenting testimonies that were not convincing.

“INEC had declared Ekweremadu winner with 86,088 vote against 15,187 scored by Ibekaku-Nwagwu. It is the responsibility of the petitioners to bring their polling unit agents to demonstrate to us how over 70,000 vote will be deducted from the score of the first respondent to make them winners.

Advertisement

wits Advert

“They only presented witnesses in few polling units and wards,” he said.

Mr Kereng said the petitioners ought to have pleaded two sets of results, including the wrong and correct results that would have returned them as winners.

Read also: Pound slides below $1.20 to three-year low as no-deal Brexit battle begins

He said certain paragraphs of their petition contained criminal allegations and that the persons whom the allegations were made against remained hidden.

“Having failed woefully to prove their allegations that the first respondent was not elected by majority of lawful vote cast, we, therefore, affirm the election of the first respondent as winner of the election,” he declared.

Mr Kereng awarded a cost of N750,000 against the petitioners.

Advertisement

Akwa-ibom Advert

Reacting, counsel to the first respondent, Justina Offiah (SAN), described the judgment as thorough, adding that all counsels in the matter had put in their best.

Mrs Offiah requested for a conservative cost against the petitioners to serve as a deterrent to election losers who would want to approach the tribunal with flimsy petitions.

However, counsel to the petitioners, Patrick Luke, said it was the constitutional right of those who are declared losers in an electoral process to seek redress in a court of law.

“It is my humble view that all the parties should bear their costs because all the parties incurred costs,” Mr Luke added.

(NAN)

Support PREMIUM TIMES' journalism of integrity and credibility

Good journalism costs a lot of money. Yet only good journalism can ensure the possibility of a good society, an accountable democracy, and a transparent government.

For continued free access to the best investigative journalism in the country we ask you to consider making a modest support to this noble endeavour.

By contributing to PREMIUM TIMES, you are helping to sustain a journalism of relevance and ensuring it remains free and available to all.

Donate


NEVER MISS A THING AGAIN! Subscribe to our newsletter

* indicates required

DOWNLOAD THE PREMIUM TIMES MOBILE APP

Now available on

  Premium Times Android mobile applicationPremium Times iOS mobile applicationPremium Times blackberry mobile applicationPremium Times windows mobile application

TEXT AD: This space is available for a Text_Ad.. Call Willie on +2347088095401 for more information


All rights reserved. This material and any other material on this platform may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, written or distributed in full or in part, without written permission from PREMIUM TIMES.