Jonathan and Buhari: The need to keep your promise By Maijama'a Sule Tankarkar

Almost at the same time, President Jonathan and former head of State, General Buhari are by their body languages and even pronouncements implying that they want to recontest the 2015 presidential election. Dr Jonathan won the election in 2011 while Gen Buhari came second in that election. However, both President Jonathan and Gen. Buhari had, at different times, given clear undertaking that 2011 would be their last presidential contest. What has happened so far that is making them to change their minds? Why are these leaders suddenly reneging on their pledges?

During the last Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) congresses and convention, President Jonathan confided in some of the aspirants and party chieftains who came to solicit his support that in 1998 when PDP was being formed and the transition to civil rule was taking place, his highest ambition was to be a commissioner in his home state of Bayelsa. He subsequently ended up as deputy governor, governor, vice president and now president of the most populous black nation on earth. He therefore admonished them to do their bit and ultimately leave the rest to God.

The Fulani have a saying that the highest point of wisdom is stupidity. That is why the typical Fulani always wants to be underrated. President Jonathan must be a good student of this African practical philosophy. When DSP Alameisiegha went for an operation in Germany and left an apparently disinterested Deputy Governor Jonathan in Bayelsa, by the time he came back, it was too late. Within days Jonathan was sworn in as governor.

The south-south main gladiators during the Obasanjo presidency were the recently convicted ex Delta Governor, James Ibori, and his Rivers counterpart, Dr. Peter Odili. Dr. Jonathan was out of the national political radar when Odili was campaigning for presidency in 2007. Dr Jonathan emerged as Vice president to President Umaru Yar Adua after the 2007 elections. The Kastina cabal largely ignored Vice President Jonathan under YarAdua. When YarAdua went to hospital in Saudi Arabia and was subsequently brought back to the Villa in the middle of one night, it was already too late, Dr Jonathan was not only acting president by then but some weeks later he was substantive President with the demise of YarAdua on May 5, 2010.

On assuming the presidency, he confided in Ms Robin Sanders, the then American ambassador in Nigeria, that he didn’t have any experience and was therefore not interested in going any further. Of course, part of the myth of the PDP winning formula is the power of incumbency and if an incumbent president of the party is not contesting and was at that time even toying with the idea of organizing credible elections by nominating Prof. Jega and co into the electoral commission, the ruling party and those who felt they would stop chopping went into panic. They convinced Jonathan to contest. He agreed.

With his image of humility and one who was seen as not belonging to the core PDP rigging machine and cultists that masquerade as the chieftains of the party, many people were willing to give him the benefit of doubt. He effortlessly got a national sympathy and subsequently a national mandate by promising to do one term to complete the second term of the YarAdua/ Jonathan joint ticket started in 2007. Based on this solemn pledge many elders and governors decided to endorse him, which led to his winning the presidency in 2011.

Less than one year into his current term, some ex-militants, as well as chieftains of his Ijaw ethnic group in and out of government have come out to say that he should come out to contest for the presidency in 2015. To add to the drama, one Mr Cypriacus Njoku was instigated to go to court to get a judgment that will make it legally possible. So far the president’s spokesmen, Reuben Abati and his lawyers have already told the whole world that the president is in his first term of office, possibly trying to pre –empt the courts.

But there are many issues involved here. Even if he got the legal judgment to clear the coast for him to contest, there are some outstanding ethical and moral issues he has to contend with. Does it mean the President is going to renege on his solemn pledge? And if he contests in 2015 and gets elected, he would have served more than the TWO terms of EIGHT years recognized by the 1999 Constitution. Would it amount to unconstitutional act since it will be more than the stipulated eight years? In any case what is even at stake is his capacity to discharge his current mandate. What has he done so far to warrant any continuity? He should concentrate and do his best now before anything else. The timing for this 2015 is rather too early and it is unnecessarily causing distraction and over heating the polity.

As for Buhari, I still see it in my mind when he was shedding tears in public and announcing to the whole world that last year would be his last time of contesting for the presidential election. Buhari stands for integrity and any attempt by him to go back on his words would reduce his credibility in the eyes of the people. It would mean that he is the same with the PDP power mongers, driven by inordinate ambition to come to power and nothing else. A Buhari without integrity cannot be Buhari. And he must know that.

In any case, after more than ten years in politics Buhari is yet to be politically skilled enough. Gen. Buhari has not been able to build the necessary alliances and sufficient bridges across the length and breadth of Nigeria to enable him win. He has contested three times but he is yet to have any credible and formidable structure and national platform to act as his vehicle of winning. Even in the north, he has not been able to garner the confidence and support of the critical middle belt; he has not gotten the crucial trust of the power blocs such as the traditional rulers and other elite. In short, what has changed so far to make Buhari think that 2015 will be different from his past attempts to get democratically elected?

This year Buhari will be 70years. He has been involved at various levels of decision- making in this country for almost forty years. He has tried his best and it is time for him to take a bow. He was at various times governor, petroleum minister and even head of state. God knows why Buhari is not yet back as president after three attempts. He has paid his dues and it is time for him to support others; guide and advise younger ones; thank God for his blessings and forgiveness for his mistakes; generally help this beloved country of ours to move ahead. One does not need to be president to contribute one’s quote and power does not come by force or through plans. Power ultimately comes from God who alone knows when to give and who to give. Jonathan and Buhari, keep your promises and leave the stage for others in 2015.  



Now available on

  Premium Times Android mobile applicationPremium Times iOS mobile applicationPremium Times blackberry mobile applicationPremium Times windows mobile application


All rights reserved. This material and any other material on this platform may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, written or distributed in full or in part, without written permission from PREMIUM TIMES.

  • concernednigerian

    There was no solemn pledge from Jonathan to anybody. Jonathan like any other candidate made pronouncements to conform to the situation at hand. I am not aware of any agreement verbal or otherwise that the President made with either his party or the country at large. What happened was that prior to the PDP convention, the governors gave the President the mandate for a four year term of office and it was on that basis that the President announced he was running for office for four years and that was correct because that was the mandate given to him by the governors elected on the platform of the PDP. There are other parties in Nigeria and none of them gave the President any mandate to run for office. It is left to the PDP to either re-present the President in 2015 or someone else. At the end of the day, Nigerians have their votes hence there is no need to make a PDP affair the affair of the country. On the other hand, Maijama’a Sule Tankarkar has a right to contest against Jonathan for the Presidency in 2015. It seems there are so many Nigerians who do not have anything to do with their time.

  • KenMani

    The power crazy Northern Muslim Hausa-Fulani must come to know that Nigeria has a constitution and all are expected to abide by its provisions. Is there anything in the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria that excludes Buhari and Jonathan from contesting the 2015 elections? Nothing, to the best of my knowledge. There is also nothing in the constitution that prevents other candidates from contesting in 2015. So, the power crazy Northern Muslim Hausa-Fulani who feel is their birthright to govern Nigeria forever are also very free to field as many candidates as they want for the 2015 elections without overheating the polity and unleashing Boko Haram on Nigerians to their own (Northern Muslim Hausa-Fulani) ultimate detriment.

  • Bolaji2012

    I have two comments. To concernednigerian Mr. Goodluck Jonathan’s double talk is not different from double talks of previous Nigerian rulers such as IBB, Abacha, Obasanjo about holding on to power through selling dummies to Nigerians and duplicitous relationship with NIgerians. In other words between IBB -Jonathan Goodluck Nigerian rulers are unethical in their power talk and relationships to Niegrians. However since these rulers IBB, Abacha, Obasanjo,Jonathan and their advocates do not believe that there is something called ETHICS in public service, then Mr. Jonathan can contest. But then Mr. Jonathan should please not make any reference to morals and ethics in his talks. He should simply hold on to power and leave after 10 years. Why? We want him to walk ETHICS and not just talk it. And if he cannot walk ETHICS just like IBB, Abacha and Mr. Jonathan’s mentor Obasanjo did not WALK ETHICS, then Mr. Jonathan should just take his 10 years just like other ordinary Nigerian rulers before him. He will not be different from his predecessors who doubletalked themselves to hand onto power. With this kind of practices, I do not think Nigeria under this kind of completely unethical dispensation should be counted as part of the civilized world where leaders make ETHICS the foundation of their relationship to their nations’ citizens.
    My second comment is to Mr. KenMani. I do not know who and what you mean by “power crazy Northern Muslim Hausa-Fulani”. How does a simple social comment by Tankarkar amount to being “power crazy Northern Muslim Hausa-Fulani”? I thought we are supposed to be civil and courteous in our disagreements on this platform. I thought that if our rulers do not respect us given the way they treat us, I thought that we ordinary people ought to respect one another in our discourse. Reading Mr. KenMani’s language to a fellow Nigerian, I can now see why Nigerian rulers treat Nigerians with contempt. Now, if you do not see the implication, this is the logic Mr. KenMani. If your did not show courtesy to Tankarkar an ordinary Nigerian like you and I, how can our rulers respect you, Tankarkar, my humble self and ordinary Nigerians? And more importantly, Politics and Laws are written into constitutions, ETHICS is not written into constitutions. Given the informal nature of ETHICS whereby we are constituted by it(or at least we ought to be constituted by it), you just know ETHICS, i.e. what you ought to do . And this will be based on your respect for yourself, your colleagues, your society and those outside the framework of yourself and colleagues. That I think is Mr. Tankarkar’s point about Mr. Jonathan and Mr. Buhari. Finally, I read the premiumtimes because I think unlike other platforms, premiumtimes promised to create space for civil and civilised dialogue among us. And that civility starts with our language-our tool of discourse. “”Power crazy Northern Muslim Hausa-Fulani”? I do not think Mr. KenMani has stood by this convenant of civil discourse. And that is not helpful.

  • Adeyemi2

    Bolaji, I agree with you. I think Mr. KenMani not only missed the point, he crossed the line of the civil mode of discourse to be cultivated on this platform-clear, sharp and even pointed analysis and critique but laden with civility of discourse and language. To me this platform is a unit of the public sphere, and we all own it equally given the nature of the public sphere. In this co-ownership, everyone has a moral responsibility to fellow Nigerians to agree or disagree with candor but with some dosage of civility and courtesy in language. Look, Mr. KenMani, we ought to be ladies and gentlemen in the content and form of our lives and writings. This is the Nigeria we are looking for, not the Nigeria of Messers IBB, Abacha, Obasanjo, Jonathan,David Mark who treat us with contempt. Mr KenMani, having missed the ethical point Tankarkar has raised, you followed this deliberate or unconscious oversight on your part with a not too good language. I am not sure that this is the right thing to do. This is why Bolaji is apt in his/her observation of your point. Thanks Bolaji. Let us all continue to hold this sense of respect for one another even when we disagree.