Sowore: Judge, lawyer exchange words in court

In what is clearly a brutal assault on free speech, Omoyele Sowore was arrested.
In what is clearly a brutal assault on free speech, Omoyele Sowore was arrested.

A judge, Nkeonye Maha, of the Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday accused a lawyer of disrupting her court proceedings.

Abubakar Marshal, a member of the legal team representing detained convener of the botched #Revolutionnow# protest, Omoyele Sowore, had approached the judge in the court shortly before the commencement of proceedings.

Mr Sowore is currently being detained by the federal government for treason after calling for an anti-government protest tagged RevolutionNow.

The court had a few weeks ago granted the request of the State Security Service to detain the Sahara Reporters publisher.

Mr Abubakar on Monday noted that the case file has not been remitted back to a judge, Taiwo Taiwo, a week after Ms Maha recused herself from hearing the matter.

Altercation

In a short exchange between the lawyer and the judge, Ms Maha accused Mr Abubakar of ”grandstanding and disrupting her proceedings”.

The lawyer then said ”it was better for him to approach the judge in open court as he does not want to have an ex parte discussion with her in chambers that could be misconstrued”.

He asked that the case file be taken back to Justice Taiwo whom he noted has resumed from vacation.

The enraged judge noted that the issue was an administrative one and ”that it would be resolved”.

“Your lordship. I am here in respect of Omoyele sowore case you remitted back to your learned brother justice Taiwo Taiwo,” the lawyer said.

Advertisement

nlng Campaign AD

The judge in response said, “Yes, is that why you are disturbing my court, grandstanding before me over an administrative matter.”

Mr Abubakar then said: “Well your lordship had recused from the said case. I was informed that the case file is still with my lord, thus preventing Hon Justice Taiwo Taiwo’s court from setting the case down for hearing of pending applications to decide the same one way or the other.”

The judge replied: “I said this is administrative, it is not a reason to come and disturb my court.”

The lawyer said, “I know your lordship. I didn’t want to have an ex parte discussion with your lordship in chambers, that is why I am here (in open court).

The judge then turned to the registrar and asked her to call the first case.

She again turned to the lawyer, “do not come and disturb my court’s business over such matters again.”

Ms Maha, addressing journalists in the courtroom, said, “Please know what you will report. I have no hand in the matter again please.”

Advertisement

PT Mag Campaign AD

Support PREMIUM TIMES' journalism of integrity and credibility

Good journalism costs a lot of money. Yet only good journalism can ensure the possibility of a good society, an accountable democracy, and a transparent government.

For continued free access to the best investigative journalism in the country we ask you to consider making a modest support to this noble endeavour.

By contributing to PREMIUM TIMES, you are helping to sustain a journalism of relevance and ensuring it remains free and available to all.

Donate


NEVER MISS A THING AGAIN! Subscribe to our newsletter

* indicates required

DOWNLOAD THE PREMIUM TIMES MOBILE APP

Now available on

  Premium Times Android mobile applicationPremium Times iOS mobile applicationPremium Times blackberry mobile applicationPremium Times windows mobile application

TEXT AD: This space is available for a Text_Ad.. Call Willie on +2347088095401 for more information


All rights reserved. This material and any other material on this platform may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, written or distributed in full or in part, without written permission from PREMIUM TIMES.