Again, ECOWAS Court postpones Nnamdi Kanu’s case

Nnamdi Kanu
Leader of IPOB, Nnamdi Kanu [Photo Credit:]

The Economic Community of West Africa ECOWAS Court, has again adjourned hearing into the fundamental rights suit filed by leader of the indigenous People of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu.

Mr. Kanu’s suit filed in March 2016 is yet to reach its hearing stage at the court since it was first brought before it.

The case had been adjourned in November 2017, after a previous postponement a month before that time, following applications by parties in the matter.

On Tuesday the court presided by Justice Hemeye Mahdmadane announced its decision to make the further adjournment after entertaining a fresh application by the prosecution.

Mr. Mahmadane said the court’s decision to adjourn is based on the fact that motions brought before the court in November were yet to be translated into English language.

At the opening of session on Monday, the prosecution counsel, Maimuna Shiru, informed the court, that her client had a motion seeking to keep the court abreast of the recent developments in the matter.

According to Ms. Shiru, her motion seeks to inform the ECOWAS court that IPOB had already been proscribed and that the Federal High Court in Abuja had affirmed the proscription of the group.

Reacting to the recent application, however, Mr. Ejiofor accused the prosecution of making unnecessary motions aimed at preventing the case from succeeding.

The court, however, warned Mr. Ejiofor to desist from making such utterances in court.

The case was adjourned to May 30.

Speaking to journalists outside the court premises, Mr. Ejiofor reiterated his points during the hearing.

“I had told them in court that adjourning this matter any further will give the insinuation to the lay man on the street that this court is not impartial. This is a fundamental rights suit that is supposed to be heard speedily. They keep adjourning it, giving the prosecution the room to be making fresh applications. If something happens at the Federal High Court today, tomorrow, they will bring a fresh application,” Mr. Ejiofor said.

In a reaction, however, Ms. Shiru said contrary to the claims by Mr. Ejiofor, they had made only one application, regarding the fundamental rights suit.

“We are fully ready to go on with this case. I don’t know why the applicant is trying to give the court an erroneous impression that we are prolonging the case. We have only filed a motion. One motion, which is our right. There are so many developments in this matter. And it behoves on us. It is our duty to inform the court about any facts on this matter,” Ms. Shiru said.


Now available on

  Premium Times Android mobile applicationPremium Times iOS mobile applicationPremium Times blackberry mobile applicationPremium Times windows mobile application

TEXT AD: Revealed!!! The Only Way Left of Getting an Extra Large Manhood and also Last Up to 38Mins+. Get the Insider Secret Here

TEXT AD: This NAFDAC APPROVED Solution Will Make You Stay Longer Than 40Mins In Bed Tonight And Help Your Erection. Click Here To Read The Free Reports

All rights reserved. This material and any other material on this platform may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, written or distributed in full or in part, without written permission from PREMIUM TIMES.

  • Tiger News

    ShitHole damn Zoo is running away, what a useless most primitive African country. Chaii that why President Trump called the continent ShitHole. Nnamdi call it Zoo.

    • Damian

      Or it is Kanu that had taken off??

    • Julius

      Running away to where ? They made a motion which is their right to do. Oh wait, I guess that is not allowed in biafraud. By the way, where is kanu ..the runner ?. This is one of the biafraudians problem which is self bloating..making yourself more than what you actually are. Mouth, mouth ! Nigeria go burn, the biafraud security agents will deal with Nigeria, Buhari not fir visit Igbo land, there won’t be election in Anambra..on and on and on…wetin happened with all those threats ? Lousy loud mouth you !

  • JasV

    Dead terrorists don’t talk or have court cases because they are already suffering in hell. Good example is osama bin laden, to be joined very soon by that yanma yanma bokoharam rotten mouth pig.