Budget Padding: Ethics Committee concludes hearing on Jibrin

Dogara Jibrin

The House of Representatives Committee on Ethics and Privileges on Monday concluded public hearing on its investigation of a lawmaker from Kano, Abdulmumin Jibrin.

At the resumed hearing on Monday afternoon, Mr. Jibrin failed to appear before the committee. He is accused of breaching the privileges of members.

Nicholas Ossai, the chairman of the 11-member committee, said Mr. Jibrin had been accorded enough privilege to defend himself.

Mr. Ossai said there was no reason why Mr. Jibrin should not appear before the committee since his demand that the proceeding be conducted before members of the public had been met.

“He asked that we invite media, civil society organisations, student unions, members of the Nigerian Bar Association and some university lecturers, which we did from the first day,” Mr. Ossai said.

The committee was convened by the House on September 21 after a lawmaker, Emmanuel Oker-Jev, moved a motion seeking the suspension of Mr. Jibrin for allegedly breaching members’ privileges by distributing internal House documents to the media.

The speaker, Yakubu Dogara, whom Mr. Jibrin accuses of budget fraud, said the Kano lawmaker, through this action, had inflicted damage to the image of the National Assembly.

Mr. Jibrin indicated over the weekend that he would not appear before the committee, citing impartiality and questioning the independence of its members.

This contradicted Mr. Jibrin’s earlier statement in which he gave conditions that Mr. Ossai cited as the only ground under which he would honour the committee’s invitation.

During the sitting, Mr. Ossai gave the clerk of the committee 30 minutes to make efforts to reach Mr. Jibrin.

The clerk said he tried to contact Mr. Jibrin through phone call and text message, without success.

“We assured him that, as a member of this committee, he would be given fair hearing. The committee also went out of its way to make sure that this proceeding is made public. I think this committee has been seen to have observed the dictates of the Constitution on the matters of fair hearing,” Mr. Ossai said.

“It is a duty for this committee that at all time Nigerian are carried along and we have done that.”

Mr. Ossai said he had challenged Mr. Jibrin or anyone else to come forward with evidence showing that he had compromised or expressed bias over the scandal. He offered to willingly recuse himself from the committee in the face of such proof.

Mr. Ossai told PREMIUM TIMES’ after the hearing that his committee would analyse evidence before forwarding it findings to the House in the shortest time possible.


Now available on

  Premium Times Android mobile applicationPremium Times iOS mobile applicationPremium Times blackberry mobile applicationPremium Times windows mobile application

TEXT AD:DIABETES Is CURABLE! Don't Let It Threaten You! To NORMALIZE Your Blood Sugar In 21Days For Life, Click Here!!!.

All rights reserved. This material and any other material on this platform may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, written or distributed in full or in part, without written permission from PREMIUM TIMES.

  • Okokondem

    To be fair, if what is being reported here that the house ethics committee met the conditions set by Jibrin is true, then the onus is on him to explain why he declined to appear forthe hearing.

    Some of us have gone out of our way to drum support for Mr Jibrin, believing in the necessity to fully investigate the accusations he has vociferously leveled against the house leadership, and possibly end business as usual in the Nigerian legislature involving the tendency for misappropriation of the budgetary process.

    The news media should therefore validate the claim by the chairman of the ethics committee, Mr Ossai, that the hearing was in fact in compliant with the conditions set forth by Jibrin that various groups and members of the society be present during the hearing.

    • realist

      The principle of fair hearing negate the committee to hear the case. Dogara that is accused appointed the members so they can’t be impartial. The members body language and utterances already alluded to this. More so, the committee is established not to for Jubrin to prove his case against Dogara but purely to try Jubrin for sining against the house. Only independent committee outside the house can be seen to do justice.

      • Karl Imom

        Thank you.

  • SAM .A

    Yoruba says ” aitete mu ole , ole nmu oloko. ” Because you do not catch a thief first on your farm , he turns round and shout thief on you . The Barawos of Budget paddlers are the one pointing accusing fingers on Mr Jubrin . These buffoons have no conscience .