Senior Nigerian lawyer, Sebastine Hon, deplores governors’ opposition to local govt. autonomy

Sebastine Hon

A Senior Advocate of Nigeria, SAN, Sebastine Hon, has deplored the continued opposition to local government autonomy by state governors across the country.

Mr. Hon, who spoke to PREMIUM TIMES on Sunday, blamed the near stagnant state of grassroots development in the country to the hijack of the local government system by state governors.

He, therefore, appealed to the National Assembly to hasten the constitutional amendment process that would guarantee the autonomy of that tier of government.

“The proposed autonomy for local governments in Nigeria by the National Assembly is a very salutary effort, which ought to be supported all the way, given the blighted history of local government administration in Nigeria,” Mr. Hon said.

The legal practitioner noted that Sections 136-145 of the Nigeria’s Republican Constitution, 1963, revenue allocation was done directly from the Federal purse to the regions consistent with the provisions of the law.

Unlike the 1999 Constitution as amended, the 1963 Constitution did not create local governments; hence it did not recognise them.

It was, however, the 1979 Constitution that first recognised the existence of this level of government as contained in Section 3(1) and (2) of that Constitution.

“This meant that in clear and unequivocal terms, the 1979 Constitution for the first time recognised the existence of local or municipal administration in Nigeria,” the legal practitioner said.

“Importantly, too, section 7(1) of that Constitution, again for the first time, provided in very mandatory and affirmative terms inter alia that ‘The system of local government by democratically elected local government councils is under this Constitution guaranteed.’

“For the first time, too, Section 149(2) of that Constitution provided that any amount standing to the credit of the Federation Account was to be distributed among the Federal and state Governments, and the local governments in each state, on such terms and in such manner as may be prescribed by the National Assembly.”

According to Mr. Hon, Section 149 (5) of the same law provided for the establishment of the State Joint Local Government Account from where all allocations from the Federal Account are paid into.

Apart from the number of states and local governments which got increased by the time the 1999 Constitution was promulgated, he argued that Section 149 of the 1979 Constitution was lifted directly to form Section 3(1, 2) and read with Part I of the 1st Schedule; and Sections 7(1) and 162(3) and (6), respectively, of the 1999 Constitution.

Mr. Hon said the current move by the National Assembly to abolish the Joint State Local Government Accounts has sparked negative reactions from state governors.

While state governors have argued that there is no Federal Constitution anywhere in the world that has granted financial autonomy to local governments, Mr. Hon said such argument is trite.

“Even though Nigeria has always been a Federation, the provisions of the 1963, 1979 and 1999 Constitutions have shown a crave for dynamism and development, to respond to apparent public outcry or concern on the way this level of government is being run,” Mr. Hon argued.

“This is exactly what the National Assembly has done, by making the current proposals for constitutional amendment. Every country’s constitution is fashioned to take care of the needs of such country.”

He cited Dangana vs. Usman, 2013, 6 NWLR, Pt. 1349, 50 at 93 S.C., where the Supreme Court held that the Constitution of any country is “the embodiment of what the people of that country desire to be their
guiding light in governance.”

Also, in Attorney-General of Kaduna State vs. Hassan, 1985, 2 NWLR, Pt. 8, 483 S.C., the Supreme Court, he also said, held that the Nigerian Constitution is meant to cater for the uniqueness of Nigeria as a nation.

Again in Attorney-General of Abia State vs. Attorney-General of the Federation, 2003, FWLR, Pt. 152, 131 S.C. and Attorney-General of Ondo State, 2002, 9 NWLR, Pt. 772, 222 S.C., some actions of the Federal Government were challenged on the ground that they infringed on the doctrine of federalism.

“The Supreme Court, in dismissing those actions, held that propounded theories of federalism must surely and always give way to express provisions of the Constitution.

“Thus, it is too simplistic and, therefore, unacceptable that a particular provision of the Constitution should be said to be invalid if it infringes on the antiquated doctrine of federalism,” arguing that a provision of the Constitution cannot be unconstitutional.

Mr. Hon further argued that some Federal constitutions like that of the Republic of South Africa grant full autonomy to local or municipal governments.

He cited the provisions of Section 153 of the South African Constitution as amended which he said mandated the local government councils to “structure and manage its administration, and budgeting and planning process to give priority to the basic needs of the community, and to promote the social and economic development of the
community.”

Also, Section 154(1) of the same Constitution compulsorily requires both the national and regional governments “by legislative and other measures” to “support and strengthen the capacity of the municipalities to manage their own affairs, to exercise their powers and to perform their functions.”

More importantly, Section 213 of that Constitution has established the National Revenue Fund, just like the Nigerian Consolidated Revenue Fund; while Section 214(a) and (b) provides that an Act of Parliament must provide for “the equitable division of revenue raised nationally among the national, provincial and local spheres of government” and “any other allocations to provinces, local government or municipalities from the national government’s share of that revenue, and any conditions on which those allocations may be made.”

He argued that the South African law does not have a Joint Provincial Local Government Account, adding that local governments in that country have complete autonomy.

“While I sympathise with the governors that the National Assembly is attempting to temper with the status quo, by proposing to make local governments autonomous in Nigeria, the said Assembly is standing in firma terra, meaning on firm grounds; hence should be supported.

“The governors should remember that after their respective tenures, they will also live with the rest of us as ordinary Nigerians; hence should support this worthy cause now,” Mr. Hon said.


DOWNLOAD THE PREMIUM TIMES MOBILE APP

Now available on

  Premium Times Android mobile applicationPremium Times iOS mobile applicationPremium Times blackberry mobile applicationPremium Times windows mobile application

TEXT AD: Revealed!!! The Only Way Left of Getting an Extra Large Manhood and also Last Up to 38Mins+. Get the Insider Secret Here


All rights reserved. This material and any other material on this platform may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, written or distributed in full or in part, without written permission from PREMIUM TIMES.


  • emmanuel

    I am sure Mr. Hong does not know that Uduaghan is part of those he is addressing negatively.

    This Hong man is shameless. A SAN who surreptitiously withdrew his client’s case at the Supreme Court (a henious crime by a Lawyer ever, because Uduaghan compromised him is hear castigating his source.

    Could he have withdrawn Ogboru’s case at the Supreme Court if he did not benefit from the proceeds of hijacked Local Government funds?

    PT is quick to cannise everybody especially if pepper dey to lick.

    • True Nigerian

      Surprisingly, you are honest and reasonable in your assessment on Uduaghan. But strangely, you consider your reasonableness to be totally inapplicable to your assessment of President Jonathan and his Federal government. Well, one of the reasons I started disliking Jonathan as a leader was when he made a decision to appear in Delta State to lift up the hands of Uduaghan as the PDP candidate for Delta in 2010. I was appalled and disgusted to see a President that calls himself Transformational leader lift up the hands of a criminal wanted by Britain and America for the pivotal role he played in Ibori’s crimes against the people of Delta state. To Jonathan, an indictee wanted as a criminal in foreign countries was good enough to be the candidate of his party in a state where the criminality of its governor had already brought Nigerians monumental shame abroad. Jonathan’s unqualified support for the man was an announcement to the world that Nigeria, under Jonathan, did not mind having heinous criminals and indictees as leaders. I mean, Uduaghan, even as a governor, cannot touch foot in any airports in America, UK, UAE and any country that has extradition agreement with UK (and there are more 8 major countries like that). So if there is need to even go on a trip to negotiate a useful deal for the people of Delta state, Uduaghan cannot go there because he will end up in a British jail if he does. Yet, he is representing Deltans today because Jonathan has no problems with criminals getting PDP tickets. And of course, in that election, Ogboru was rigged out in the most audacious rigging spree. I was one of the monitors in that election, and I wept for the people of Delta state and Nigeria as a whole. And what did Jonathan do? He stood by that.

      So when you call Uduaghan the names that he deserves to be called – a criminal and a rascal – and then pretend that Jonathan must stay in power for another 4 years, don’t you think it makes you a squalid hypocrite? And I think it’s a fair judgement. You can’t claim you hate one thing and then repeatedly, without sufficient reasons, defend a man who does and facilitates the same thing you claim to hate. It’s sheer hipocrisy. And that’s exactly what ethno-religious bigotry makes people to become. They may hate stealing and murder, but if the killer is from their favorite tribe, then stealing and murder suddenly becomes a normal event that should not be punished. It is degeneration of the human mind and conscience.

    • Ekoi

      Emmanuel, you should hide your face in shame for coming here to make unsubstantiated claims just to rubbish someone. I advise PT to remove this unfair comment. If Mr. Ogboru had substantial evidence of graft against Mr. Hon, he could have written to relevant authorities for redress.

    • Mykelsyn Bem

      You should stop making baseless comments here. Do you even know what you are saying??? Do you even know who Sebastine Hon(SAN) is? You should be the the shameless person here Emmanuel, because you don’t even know how to spell this man’s name and you’re commenting about him. This is a very dedicated lawyer. It is against God and humanity to call him shameless and speak such unethical nonsense! I have never known a more incorruptible man like him. I do not know what you gain from insulting this man. Or are you paid to do so? Please, never say what you do not know else it will all bounce back at you. He should even be your mentor because you will learn a lot from his carefulness. My candid advise for you is that you should never make public criticism on someone you relatively know nothing about. Else, you will only be exposing how much of an unwise person you are to the public. People like me will hence, have an opportunity to say you are shameless. Sebastine Hon(SAN) has proven to be incorrupt as recently he was fighting against Dangote in court on behalf of the suffering Mbayion people in Gboko L.G.A., Benue state. Though he was given the chance to succumb and get benefits, he never did so. The Respectable SAN is also has no link at all with politics. Please be careful not to judge blindly next time except with proof. I did not mean to be rude but me and my people hold him in the highest esteem as he is very amazing.

  • Helen James

    Hello let me give this testimony to the public about a great man who
    help me out in serious illness I have HIV AID for good 5year and I was
    almost going to the end of my life due to the way my skin look like all I
    have in my mind is let me just give up because life is not interesting
    to me any longer but I just pray for God every day to accept my soul
    when ever I’m gone lucky to me my kids sister run to me that she found a
    doctor in the internet who can cure HIV online she help
    me out on everything, the doctor ask for my deities, so he can prepare
    the herbal medicine for me from his temple after all he ask is done one
    week later I started getting more stronger my blood start flow normally
    for 4 to 5 days I start getting Wight before a month my body start
    developing my skin start coming up after 2month I went for HIV test and I
    was tested negative I’m so happy that I can say I’m not a HIV patient
    if you have HIV/AID or any sickness he can still help you in getting
    your ex-back to you please contact him via his email
    drosassolutioncenter@gmail.com or
    call him on phone +2349035428122