Efforts by operatives of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, to arrest the former Kogi State Governor, Abubakar Audu, Tuesday, failed as the ex-governor allegedly fled his 32 Suleiman Barau Street, Aso Villa, Asokoro, Abuja, residence.
The attempted arrest of the former governor, who is accused of fraudulently enriching himself to the tune of over N4 billion while he was Kogi Governor between 1999 and 2003, followed a Supreme Court ruling of November 23 which dismissed the ex-governor’s appeal to continue to protract his corruption trial by the EFCC.
The Supreme Court ruling clears the way for Mr. Audu’s fresh arraignment by the anti-graft commission
Mr. Audu was arrested in Jos in 2006 after a six months manhunt by operatives of the Commission, before his earlier arraignment at the Kogi State High Court on December 1, 2006, on an 80-count charge of conspiracy, fraud, criminal breach of trust, and embezzlement of public funds.
The EFCC, while the case lasted at the High Court, caused issuance of nolle prosequi by the former Attorney- General of Kogi State, John Agbonika and the Attorney-General of the Federation, Bayo Ojo on February 8, 2007 for the case to be discontinued at the Kogi State High Court as the Commission claimed to have lost faith in the handling of the matter by the State High Court.
A nolle prosequi meant the commission was no longer interested in pursuing the case at the court.
“In my capacity as the AG of Kogi state in collaboration with the AG of the Federation and by virtue of the power vested in me by Section 211 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 and Section 253 of the CPC and all the powers enabling me in that behalf, I Dr. John Alewo Agbonika hereby inform this honourable court that I no longer intend to continue the prosecution of this case in collaboration with the AG of the Federation to whom I had given a fiat to prosecute this case,” Mr. Agbonika,, the former Kogi State Attorney General, said.
But rather than discontinue the matter in the spirit of the nolle prosequi, the trial judge went ahead as he further referred two questions to the Court of Appeal for determination.
In a judgement delivered by Bode Rhodes-Vivour, the Supreme Court held that the Court of Appeal was wrong to consider the questions referred to it for determination after being aware from the records of Appeal that a nolle prosequi had been filed.
“This is so because there is/was nothing before the trial court, so there would be nothing for the Court of Appeal to send back. It amounted to an academic exercise for the Court of Appeal to waste judicial time considering questions from a case that is no longer in existence. There was no longer live issue to be considered by the Court of appeal in view of nolle prosequi filed in the trial court”, the Supreme Court ruled.
Part of the setback suffered by the EFCC in the prosecution of the case was the filing of several applications by the defendant for stay of proceedings at the high court pending the final determination of the appeal.
Mr. Audu had on December 12, 2011, through his lead counsel, Mike Ozekhome, filed the stay of proceedings motion supported by an 11-paragraph Affidavit. This was 26 clear days after the Supreme Court of Nigeria on November 16, 2011, struck out a similar application he filed on January 24, 2011.
Support PREMIUM TIMES' journalism of integrity and credibility
Good journalism costs a lot of money. Yet only good journalism can ensure the possibility of a good society, an accountable democracy, and a transparent government.
For continued free access to the best investigative journalism in the country we ask you to consider making a modest support to this noble endeavour.
By contributing to PREMIUM TIMES, you are helping to sustain a journalism of relevance and ensuring it remains free and available to all.
TEXT AD: To advertise here . Call Willie +2347088095401...