Alleged Rape: Court dismisses Dakolo’s case against Fatoyinbo

Timi Dakolo's wife
Busola Dakolo

A Nigerian judge has dismissed rape allegations against Biodun Fatoyinbo, a famous Abuja-based preacher of Commonwealth of Zion Assembly.

Oathman Musa of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, Bwari Division, dismissed the case filed by Busola Dakolo on Thursday afternoon, saying it was statute-barred because it happened decades ago.

Mrs Dakolo, the wife of musician Timi, had claimed in media interviews months ago that Mr Fatoyinbo raped her around 1999. She said she was 16 at the time.

The Nigerian child rights law prescribed 18 as the age of consent when it was enacted in 2003. But it was not adopted until years after by several states, including Kwara where Mrs Dakolo said the alleged sexual assault took place.

Several states in northern Nigeria still have yet to codify the regulations in their statute-book.

Mr Fatoyinbo denied all allegations of rape and threatened lawsuit against the Dakolos, who initiated legal action to convict the COZA pastor of the charges.

While presiding over the matter at the resumed hearing on Thursday, Mr Musa said the charges should have been brought within the permitted six years.

The judge subsequently dismissed Ms Fatoyinbo’s case as a waste and abuse of judicial process designed to punish Mr Fatoyinbo rather than obtain justice against his alleged wrongdoing.

Mr Musa also imposed a N1 million fine against Pelumi Olajengbesi, the lawyer representing the Dakolos in the case, in his personal capacity, according to court documents obtained by The Punch. The judge said the fine should have been 10 times more than that considering the time of the court wasted in entertaining the case, but he pegged it at N1 million in order not to deter rape victims from seeking justice in court.

Mr Olajengbesi said the matter would be appealed because the judge failed to appreciate the significance of the case.

“The court said the matter is statute-barred,” Mr Olajengbesi told PREMIUM TIMES after the decision. “But the court did not seem to appreciate the magnitude of the case so we are approaching a superior court that will be better measured in its ruling.”

Editor’s Note: This article has been updated to show that the judge imposed a fine on the lawyer and not on the Dakolos as previously reported.


PT Mag Campaign AD

Support PREMIUM TIMES' journalism of integrity and credibility

Good journalism costs a lot of money. Yet only good journalism can ensure the possibility of a good society, an accountable democracy, and a transparent government.

For continued free access to the best investigative journalism in the country we ask you to consider making a modest support to this noble endeavour.

By contributing to PREMIUM TIMES, you are helping to sustain a journalism of relevance and ensuring it remains free and available to all.


TEXT AD: To advertise here . Call Willie +2347088095401...

BE THE FIRST TO KNOW! Subscribe to our newsletter

* indicates required


Now available on

  Premium Times Android mobile applicationPremium Times iOS mobile applicationPremium Times blackberry mobile applicationPremium Times windows mobile application

All rights reserved. This material and any other material on this platform may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, written or distributed in full or in part, without written permission from PREMIUM TIMES.