Senate rejects motion seeking to debate Buhari’s Democracy Day speech

Nigerian senate chambers where senators attend plenary
Nigerian senate chambers

The majority of Nigerian senators Thursday voted against a motion to debate President Muhammadu Buhari’s Democracy Day speech in plenary.

The motion to scrutinise the speech was moved by Istifanus Gyang (Plateau-PDP).

Coming under Order 52 of the Senate standing order, Mr Gyang asked his colleagues, through the Senate President, Ahmed Lawan, to grant him the leave to present a motion on a matter of public importance.

“The matter of urgent national importance I am bringing before this Senate has to do with the democracy day speech of President Muhammadu Buhari of the 12th June 2019. This speech is already in the public domain. I am asking that in view of the interest it has generated…,” he said.

The lawmaker was cut short by Mr Lawan who asked to seek the consent of other senators to entertain the motion.
After putting the question, the majority of the lawmakers voted against the motion and it was consequently shut down.

It is not clear which part of the speech Mr Gyang wanted to raise.

Highlights of the speech delivered at Eagle’s Square, Abuja on Wednesday include a proposal for the renaming of the National Stadium after the widely acclaimed winner of 1993 election, Moshood Abiola.

Mr Buhari also promised to take 100 million Nigerians from poverty to prosperity in the next 10 years.

Another motion shut down

Shortly after rejecting Mr Gyang’s motion, another senator, Uche Ekwunife (Anambra-PDP), signified interest to present a similar motion.

Mrs Ekwunife said she had earlier informed the Senate President on presenting a motion on Mr Buhari’s speech but was asked to bring it up as an amendment to Mr Gyang’s prayers.

Advertisement

RIPAN Campaign AD

She prayed to be allowed to present her motion since she could not get the amendment opportunity as earlier arranged.

Mrs Ekwunife was asked to present her motion on another legislative day.

Mr Lawan made this ruling on the argument that she raised her point of order a little late as the Senate had that time proceeded to the first order of the day.

Support PREMIUM TIMES' journalism of integrity and credibility

Good journalism costs a lot of money. Yet only good journalism can ensure the possibility of a good society, an accountable democracy, and a transparent government.

For continued free access to the best investigative journalism in the country we ask you to consider making a modest support to this noble endeavour.

By contributing to PREMIUM TIMES, you are helping to sustain a journalism of relevance and ensuring it remains free and available to all.

Donate


NEVER MISS A THING AGAIN! Subscribe to our newsletter

* indicates required

DOWNLOAD THE PREMIUM TIMES MOBILE APP

Now available on

  Premium Times Android mobile applicationPremium Times iOS mobile applicationPremium Times blackberry mobile applicationPremium Times windows mobile application

TEXT AD: This space is available for a Text_Ad.. Call Willie on +2347088095401 for more information


All rights reserved. This material and any other material on this platform may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, written or distributed in full or in part, without written permission from PREMIUM TIMES.