How judge convicted subsidy fraudster, sentenced him to 10 years in prison

Rowaye Jubril quietly walked out of the dock after the judge pronounced a 10 years jail term on him for fuel subsidy fraud. He whispered to one of his staff, “We will appeal it.”

On Thursday, Justice Lateefa Okunnu of an Ikeja Division of the Lagos High Court, said she considered Mr. Jubril’s body language during the trial before pronouncing her sentence.

“I have taken into consideration that the defendant (Mr. Jubril) is a first time offender, I have also noted his demeanour,” said Mrs. Okunnu as she read her two hour-long judgment.

“I find the first and second defendants guilty on each count and are hereby convicted on each of the (13) counts.”

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission arraigned Mr. Jubril and his company, Brila Energy, in November 2012 for allegedly perpetrating a N963.7 million subsidy fraud.

The accused had pleaded not guilty.

The prosecution presented 20 witnesses before the judge while 43 documents were tendered as evidence during the trial.

The defence did not call any witness.

In delivering her judgment on Thursday, Mrs. Okunnu said she relied, among others, on a 79-page document submitted to the Petroleum Products Pricing and Regulatory Agency by Mr. Jubril while acting for Brila Energy Ltd.

According to the defendants, a ship, MT Overseas Limar, delivered over 13,000 metric tons of petrol to a daughter vessel, MT Delphina, at Cotonou, offshore Benin Republic, and later to a smaller shuttle vessel which deposited the product to Obat Oil’s tank farm in Lagos.

The purported transaction occurred in January 2011.

The judge agreed with the prosecution’s case that all the documents used for the transaction were forged by the defendants.

Also, the location of MT Overseas Limar, the mother vessel, on the day of the purported transaction was in Canada, Central America, from where it departed to Venezuela, according to Lloyd’s List Intelligence report.

The EFCC also proved that two documents the defendants claimed originated from a Brazilian company which supplied the refined crude – certificate of quantity and gasoline analysis – were forged.

The Brazilian firm confirmed to the agency that the said documents had been used for a different transaction two years earlier.

“The law is for he that asserts to prove. The prosecution must prove its case to a standard that all reasonable doubt is eliminated,” the judge noted.

“It is not for the defendant to prove his innocence; it is rather for the prosecution to prove his guilt.”

The judge noted, from the documents presented by the defendants, that the ship’s manifest stated that the vessel left Brazil on 22nd November, 2010, while another document showed that the gasoline analysis began on the same day and didn’t end until the next day.

“It beats the imagination how this could happen,” Mrs. Okunnu said.

“This circumstance further erodes the integrity of the defendants,” she added.

The judge lauded the testimony of one of the prosecution’s witnesses, Kalu Peters, a cargo inspector at General Marine and Oil Ltd, for being “direct and first hand.”

“His credibility as a witness of truth was not tainted through the test of cross examination.”

As a result, the judge relied fully on Mr. Peters’ evidence that it was another vessel, MT Gabro, and not MT Overseas Limar, that discharged 13,200 metric tons to MT Delphina in January 2011.

“MT Overseas Limar was never mentioned at all,” the judge said.

“The defendant in my opinion always knew that MT Overseas Limar had no part to play in the exercise.

“The first that heard of MT Overseas Limar was during the subsidy claim.

“It is my finding that the defendants were parties to a crime, even though the physical crime of forgery was not committed themselves. They intended to deceive and did deceive because they received payments.”

The judge further noted that the firm, Ports Cargo Experts Ltd, which claimed to have supervised the trans-shipment of the products by the defendants made a false claim. She said the company’s Certificate of Incorporation showed that Mr. Jubril sits on its Board.

“The defendant by presenting the firm’s claims knowing that the contents were false, there was a proven intention to defraud,” Mrs. Okunnu said.

The judge said the first defendant, as the managing director and chief executive officer of the second defendan,t was its “alter ego” and “directing mind.”

“Being the alter ego, he’s just as culpable as the second defendant. One of them cannot excuse himself or itself of criminal liability.”

Before the judge pronounced her sentence, the defence counsel pleaded that she temper justice with mercy because the convicts were first offenders and that Mr. Jubril had consistently shown remorse.

The counsel also prayed the judge to be lenient because the first convict “is diabetic and hypertensive.”

But Seidu Atteh, counsel to the EFCC, said there was no record of the convict’s health condition.

The judge convicted Mr. Jubril on Count One of fraud and sentenced him to ten years imprisonment.

She also convicted him on counts 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 for forgery and sentenced him to eight years on each counts.

For counts 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, and 13 on altering of documents, the judge convicted the defendant and sentenced him to eight years on each of the counts.

The sentences are to run concurrently, according to the judge, meaning the defendant will spend a maximum 10 years in prison.

For the second defendant, Brila Energy Ltd, Mrs. Okunnu made an order of restitution for the refund of N963,796,199.88k obtained by false pretences to the Nigerian government.


DOWNLOAD THE PREMIUM TIMES MOBILE APP

Now available on

  Premium Times Android mobile applicationPremium Times iOS mobile applicationPremium Times blackberry mobile applicationPremium Times windows mobile application

TEXT AD:"Warning to Men, These 3 Foods is Slowly Killing Your Erection". Click Here to Know Them


All rights reserved. This material and any other material on this platform may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, written or distributed in full or in part, without written permission from PREMIUM TIMES.


  • kusanagi

    “For the second defendant, Brila Energy Ltd, Mrs. Okunnu made an order of restitution for the refund of N963,796,199.88k obtained by false pretences to the Nigerian government.”

    That’s the important part. Make sure they go to jail and don’t have the loot to come back to.
    Do this to enough people and Crooked Nigerians will think twice before committing fraud.

  • Nkem

    The thing is that these judges will convict if they want to convict. Whenever they don’t want to convict, no evidence would ever be sufficient, no matter the weight of evidence.
    Kudos to Justice Lateefah Okunnu for this one.

    • Uzoma John

      But at least there is conviction and restitution. You should rather encourage other judges to toe this line. Before now, how many of these rogues were convicted?

  • realist

    Is like, opportunity to bribe judges is becoming slim thus struggling to do justice. Well is good sha for the system.

  • Bimbo.

    One of the goats eating our yam goes to jail. Ajibole people too plenti for this country.

  • share Idea

    Does anybody need to know why conviction of this could easily be secured with water tight evidence. Ask previous administration why they have to build a water tight case before charging someone to court instead of current charade in the name of fighting corruption.

    Where are all those people that claimed GEJ never fought corruption. Methodical approach will always triumph over body language. Do you hear anybody shouting witch-hunting for the fuel subsidy cases – no, because the probe was all inclusive and not targeted at any individual.

    • oyoko

      you make me laugh, a case that started in 2012 with water tight evidence as you claimed the previous Govt made to happen could not get conviction in 2014 0r 2015, but 2017. this will tell you only one thing, that previous Govt did not do anything, at the time they were there, no water tight evidence was available, it takes the present Govt aggressive tendency to fight corruption that has made this happen. pls save us the history GEJ Govt, it was a disaster!

      • share Idea

        Please can you be honest with yourself that the evidence quoted by the ruling judge were not in the public domain during the fuel subsidy probe of last administration.

        Hope EFCC has not been securing conviction till this administration came onboard – hypocrite. Last administration fought corruption without discrimination while the present government is manifestly selective in its fight against corruption.

        Hence, the corruption fight is a charade to every discerning minds. Keep allowing yourself to be deceived by this lying administration

  • Rommel

    I hope Mrs world bank economist Okonjo Iweala is following developments,hers was to be paying subsidy claims left and right

  • Africa

    All the so called criminals in a Nigeria are ‘diabetic and hypertensive’.. is there a correlation between stealing and these ailments?

  • Olatubosun

    This will teach others lesson

  • Olatubosun

    They think…. They can just stole our money and run away, this is buhari administration…..
    Not Jonathan administration….. In Jonathan administration if you stole billions of naira you Will be asked to repay 1000

  • Olatubosun

    In this regime either you return the money or go to jail if you fail to do so

  • Olatubosun

    God bless Nigeria and God bless buhari and his cabinets

  • ojays

    The offence was committed during last administration but prosecution by present administration pls

  • Osakue

    PRAISE BE TO JAH.