Rivers state not intimidated by President Jonathan over disputed oil community

Goodluck Jonathan

Rivers and Bayelsa states at war over oil community.

 

Nov.2 (PREMIUM TIMES) — The Rivers State government has said it will not pander to intimidations by the president by giving up ownership of an oil community in dispute between the state and President Goodluck Jonathan’s home state, Bayesla.

The government said this on Friday in a statement reacting to another statement issued earlier by its neighbouring Bayelsa state government and the Presidency.

“The Rivers State Government wishes to state that it has and will continue to accord the highest respect to the person and office of His Excellency, the President, but will never ever submit to any attempt, as is being orchestrated now, to be intimidated in its responsibility of preserving the property and resources that rightly belong to the people of Rivers State,” Ibim Semenitari, the state’s information commissioner said.

Rivers and Bayelsa states are at loggerheads over derivation proceeds from a Kalabari community sharing boundaries with Nembe in Bayelsa state.

The River state government claims that portion was originally part of its territory until an error by the National boundary commission in the 11th edition of Nigeria’s administrative boundaries which ceded the disputed portion to Bayelsa state.

“The 11th edition of the administrative map, clandestinely prepared by the National boundary Commission and the Federal Surveyor General’s office in 1999, but published in 2000, strangely shifted the boundaries between Rivers and Bayelsa states from the initial boundary between Kalabari and Nembe, west of the Santa Barbara River, to San Bartholomew River, contrary to the delineation by all preceding administrative maps of Nigeria and all historical records,” the information commissioner said.

Ms. Semeniari said that in a letter dated July 3, 2002, the Director General, National Boundary Commission acknowledged the error and apologized.

She added that a Supreme Court judgment placed derivation claims from the oil wells in the community in an escrow account pending when the boundary commission corrects the error it admitted in the 11th edition of the administrative map of Nigeria.

But recently, the money contained in the account was released to the Bayelsa state government fuelling the current dispute.

“Why would the accruals from the disputed wells which have been kept in escrow all these years to await the final resolution of the matter be suddenly paid to Bayelsa state just recently?” Ms.Semenitari asked?

The tussle between the states also precipitated protests by Kalabari National Forum in Port Hacourt and Abuja.

On Tuesday, the Bayelsa State Government issued a press statement condemning the protest describing it as “malicious and unconstitutional intent to balkanize and excise oil producing communities in Kalabari Kingdom of Rivers State and annexing them to be part of Bayelsa State.”

The Presidency also issued a statement distancing itself from the tussle.


DOWNLOAD THE PREMIUM TIMES MOBILE APP

Now available on

  Premium Times Android mobile applicationPremium Times iOS mobile applicationPremium Times blackberry mobile applicationPremium Times windows mobile application

TEXT AD:ADVERTISE HERE! CALL 07088095401


All rights reserved. This material and any other material on this platform may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, written or distributed in full or in part, without written permission from PREMIUM TIMES.


  • Donald

    Bourgeois and Proletarians  a case study of Nigeria
    Freeman and slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guild-master and journeyman, in a word, oppressor and oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one another, carried on an uninterrupted, now hidden, now open fight, a fight that each time ended, either in a revolutionary reconstitution of society at large, or in the common ruin of the contending classes. The kernel of this piece may not be well taking now or many years to come, the proletoriate are the direct making of the bourgeois who in a quest to get rich created a class through labour laws, accumulating lands and resources to themselves privatizing and buying the privatize company such as NEPA,Nitel etc, the proletoriate some day will no longer be comfortable with either the work ethics, remuneration,or working conditions which may lead to destruction and dropping of work tools. These proletoriate will take to the street after many days of hunger strike will resort to eaten of their Lords, MD/ CEO, pastors, bishops, Imam, Presidents, and others may not be speared. This is just the making of Boko Haram and other group by men so hungry and thirsty for blood and power,