It’s illegal for Trump to block critics on Twitter – U.S. Appeal Court

Donald Trump [Photo: BBC]
Donald Trump [Photo: BBC]

President Donald Trump cannot block Twitter critics from his @realDonaldTrump personal account, a federal appeals panel ruled on Tuesday.

The New York-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Mr Trump’s Twitter account is a public forum, and blocking users based on viewpoint violates America’s First Amendment, which guarantees freedom of speech. The decision could set off a possible appeal to the Supreme Court.

“We do conclude, however, that the First Amendment does not permit a public official who utilises a social media account for all manner of official purposes to exclude persons from an otherwise‐open online dialogue because they expressed views with which the official disagrees,” Barrington Parker, who wrote the court’s majority opinion, said. “In resolving this appeal, we remind the litigants and the public that if the First Amendment means anything, it means that the best response to a disfavoured speech on matters of public concern is more speech, not less.”

The lawsuit was coordinated by the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, and several individuals whom the president blocked were amongst the plaintiffs.

The ruling upheld the decision of U.S. District Court of Southern New York in May 2018. Although the judge, Naomi Buchwald, did not find that the @realDonaldTrump account is itself a public forum, she said each tweet, and the thousands of replies that follow, are a public forum subject to the First Amendment.

The 2nd Circuit affirmed that conclusion, saying: “The account was intentionally opened for public discussion when the president, upon assuming office, repeatedly used the account as an official vehicle for governance and made its interactive features accessible to the public without limitation.”

The United States Department of Justice had argued that Mr Trump’s handle should not fall under First Amendment constraints.

The government’s lawyers also argued that even if Mr Trump’s account establishes a public form, blocking users should not be illegal because they can still access the president’s tweets by other means.

But the judges rejected those arguments, saying even senior White House officials have described the @realDonaldTrump handle as an official account, answered congressional records requests with references to the account, and used the account as a medium through which to communicate major policy decisions like the ban on transgender military personnel.

The judges also said tweets from Mr Trump’s account fall under the Presidential Records Act, which makes them official government activities.

Advertisement

nlng Campaign AD

Advertisement

PT Mag Campaign AD

Support PREMIUM TIMES' journalism of integrity and credibility

Good journalism costs a lot of money. Yet only good journalism can ensure the possibility of a good society, an accountable democracy, and a transparent government.

For continued free access to the best investigative journalism in the country we ask you to consider making a modest support to this noble endeavour.

By contributing to PREMIUM TIMES, you are helping to sustain a journalism of relevance and ensuring it remains free and available to all.

Donate


NEVER MISS A THING AGAIN! Subscribe to our newsletter

* indicates required

DOWNLOAD THE PREMIUM TIMES MOBILE APP

Now available on

  Premium Times Android mobile applicationPremium Times iOS mobile applicationPremium Times blackberry mobile applicationPremium Times windows mobile application

TEXT AD: This space is available for a Text_Ad.. Call Willie on +2347088095401 for more information


All rights reserved. This material and any other material on this platform may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, written or distributed in full or in part, without written permission from PREMIUM TIMES.