Judge awards N20,000 against Evans’ lawyer for ‘professional misconduct’

Kidnap kingpin, Evans, paraded by security operatives [Photo: Punch Newspapers]
Kidnap kingpin, Evans, paraded by security operatives [Photo: Punch Newspapers]

Justice Abdulazeez Anka of a Lagos Division of the Federal High Court Thursday awarded a cost of N20,000 against Olukoya Ogungbeje, counsel to suspected kidnapper, Chukwudumeme Onwuamadike, popularly known as Evans.

The judge further issued a warning to Mr. Ogungbeje to desist from practices unbecoming of a legal practitioner.

The judge issued the orders while adjourning a fundamental rights suit filed on behalf of Evans by Mr. Ogungbeje, over alleged illegal detention.

Joined as respondents in the suit are: The Nigeria Police Force, Lagos State Police Command, The Commissioner of Police Lagos State, and the Special Anti-Robbery Squad.

Evans had sought a court’s order directing the respondents to immediately charge him to court in accordance with constitutional provisions, if there existed any case against him.

In the alternative, he had sought an order compelling the respondents to immediately release him unconditionally in the absence of any charge.

The case, which was scheduled for hearing on Thursday, could not proceed as Mr. Ogungbeje, was absent in court.

When the case was called, a litigation officer from Mr. Ogungbeje’s law firm, Stephen Abunike, told the court that his principal was indisposed and had written a letter seeking an adjournment.

Mr. Abunike added that he had attempted to serve a copy of the letter to the police counsel in court, but the counsel declined service.

In response, the counsel to the police, Emmanuel Eze, told the court that he had only seen the letter in court, and noted that the letter was signed by one Saheed Sanni, a lawyer in Mr. Ogungbeje’s law firm.

Mr. Eze urged the court to reject the excuse and consider same as an affront to the court, adding that it showed that the law firm was unserious.

He urged the court to award a punitive cost of N100,000 against the applicant and his counsel.

In a short ruling, however, Justice Anka awarded a punitive cost of N20,000 against Mr. Ogungbeje for what he described as unprofessional conduct.

The judge noted that while Mr. Ogungbeje had written a letter to the court, he did not send a copy of the letter to the counsel for the police.

According to the judge, it is unprofessional for a lawyer to communicate with a judge without carrying the other parties along.

The judge warned Mr. Ogungbeje to desist from such a conduct.

“The court has noted the conduct of counsel, who wrote to the court without copying other parties. This is unprofessional, and the court hereby warns the counsel to desist from such a conduct. A punitive cost of N20,000 is hereby awarded for such conduct,” the judge said.

Mr. Anka adjourned the case until July 20 for hearing.

In the suit marked, FHC/L/CS/1012/2017, Mr. Evans is contending that his continued detention by the respondents since June 10, 2017, without being charged to court or released on bail is an infringement on his fundamental human rights.

He argued that the respondents ought to have charged him to court in accordance with the provisions of Sections 35 and 36 of the Constitution.

It was further argued that the alleged offence committed by the applicant (Evans) are correspondingly intertwined with the constitutional safeguards as provided under Sections 35 and 36 of the Constitution.

In a 27-paragraph affidavit in support of the motion deposed to by Evan’s father, Stephen Onwuamadike, it was averred that the applicant has been subjected to media trial without any court’s order by the respondents.

Evans’ father further averred that the media trial and news orchestrated by the respondents have continued to generate reactions in both print and electronic media without his son being afforded fair hearing and trial before a court of law.

The deponent also averred that since his son’s arrest, all his family members have been denied access to him while media practitioners have been granted unfettered access to him.

He is therefore, claiming the sum of N300,000 against the respondents, in damages.


DOWNLOAD THE PREMIUM TIMES MOBILE APP

Now available on

  Premium Times Android mobile applicationPremium Times iOS mobile applicationPremium Times blackberry mobile applicationPremium Times windows mobile application

TEXT AD:DIABETES Is CURABLE! Don't Let It Threaten You! To NORMALIZE Your Blood Sugar In 21Days For Life, Click Here!!!.


All rights reserved. This material and any other material on this platform may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, written or distributed in full or in part, without written permission from PREMIUM TIMES.


  • LATEST NEWS1

    GET CEMENT FROM THE FACTORY AT #1,300 PER BAG, CALL THE SALES MANAGER MR BALOGUN MARK ON: 08142739358

  • Frank Bassey

    Charge and bail Lawyer. He will soon withdraw from the case.

  • David Adeniran

    Is this a lawyer or good Kidnapping Samaritan?

  • Opekete

    He is not doing this pro bono. He wanted his own share of the money Evans has stashed away from his kidnapping enterprise and he must have succeeded in getting a cut before he even approach the court. Also knowing the police in Nigeria, they probably are behind the idea of getting him a lawyer in order to fleece some money from him. The police will not want to ask for bribe but they can feed him with lies and made him believe that he has a legal chance to get off the hook. Evans will pay the lawyer and the lawyer will report back to the police for their own cut. I cannot make any other sense from the whole thing than this.

    • sola

      You are right..some bad eggs in the police are behind this act, it’s just unfortunate we have some useless elements in the legal profession.