UPDATE: Why we amended false asset declaration charge against Saraki – CCB

Senate President Bukola Saraki
Senate President Bukola Saraki

The Code of Conduct Tribunal has adjourned the trial of Senate President Bukola Saraki to allow the defendant time to peruse the amended charge against the defendant.

The prosecution counsel, Rotimi Jacobs, had on Wednesday informed the tribunal of its decision to amend the 16-count charge brought against Mr. Saraki.

After Mr. Jacobs stated his client’s request to amend the charge, the tribunal adjourned hearing.

When the session resumed, the defence counsel, Kanu Agabi, asked the court for an adjournment to allow the defendant understand the details of the amended charge.

He prayed the court for an adjournment till February 28, but Mr. Jacobs objected the application saying a long adjournment was unnecessary.

Mr. Agabi had hinged his request on the claim that the prosecution was the one delaying the case.

“This is the second amendment. Are we the ones delaying the trial? It is a serious case. We need to go and study the amendment; we need time.

“He has a right to seek an amendment and we have a right too to seek time to go through the charges,” said Mr. Agabi.

The tribunal chairman, Danladi Umar, adjourned the matter to February 23 to take the plea of Mr. Saraki on the amended charges.

Speaking with journalists after the hearing, Mr. Jacobs said the amended charges, now 18-count are based on fresh evidences gotten from the testimonies by witnesses.

“It’s not about an increase in the charge, we just needed to amend it to suit the new evidences from testimonies of witnesses. There is no need to make heavy weather out of this fresh charges; (they are) in line with the former one,” said Mr. Jacobs.

Mr. Saraki’s trial began in 2015, with a 13-count charge, bordering on false asset declaration.

The charges were later increased to 16-counts, in 2016.


DOWNLOAD THE PREMIUM TIMES MOBILE APP

Now available on

  Premium Times Android mobile applicationPremium Times iOS mobile applicationPremium Times blackberry mobile applicationPremium Times windows mobile application

TEXT AD:WARNING TO MEN: These 3 Foods is Killing Your Erection. Click Here to Know Them...


All rights reserved. This material and any other material on this platform may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, written or distributed in full or in part, without written permission from PREMIUM TIMES.


  • thusspokez

    We need to go and study the amendment; we need time.

    20 days to read a few amended paragraphs? This confirms my long-held belief that most lawyers are thick, hence they are slow on their jobs. They have become even slower than previous generations despite information technology and the Internet. Can anyone think of any profession with so many thick people?

    • princegab

      The accused, prosecutors and judges on this case are birds of same feathers. CORRUPT.

      • thusspokez

        Plus thick!

      • Osakue

        Saraki done settle everybody from gateman to CCB chairman

  • Okokondem

    If there was any doubt the war against corruption mantra was just that, a mantra, it was the failure of the Attorney General and the justice system to use the independent counsel statute to specifically fast track high profile cases involving embezzlement and money laundary.

    Such move became absolutely necessary in order to counteract the never ending legal maneuvers by defense lawyers to scuttle the system.

    I started having doubt about the seriousness of fighting corruption when despite Buhari’s campaign promises, he failed to declare his assets in a way that was transparent and convincing.

    Every day we read about corruption cases or allegations of malfeasance but never a conviction. Ibori escaped prosecution in Nigeria by running to Dubai only to be apprehended by the UK legal authorities. Now he is treated like a hero upon arrival in Nigeria. So much for fighting corruption.

  • Ijeuwa

    CORRUPTION IN THE JUDICIARY!