Money Laundering: Drama in court as ex-Governor Ohakim’s son is accused of threatening witness

FILE PHOTO: Former Imo state governor, Ikedi Ohakim, arriving an Abuja court for  corruption trial.
FILE PHOTO: Former Imo state governor, Ikedi Ohakim, arriving an Abuja court for corruption trial.

An unforeseen drama unfolded on Tuesday, stalling the cross-examination of prosecution witness, Abu Sule, in the case involving a former governor of Imo State, Ikedi Ohakim.

During the proceeding, prosecution counsel, Festus Keyamo, alleged that the accused’s son, Emeka Ohakim, went on the trail of the prosecution witness and threatening him.

Mr. Ohakim is being prosecuted by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission for allegedly making a cash payment of $2, 290,000.00 (Two Million, Two Hundred and Ninety-Thousand Dollars) for a piece of land at Plot No. 1098 Cadastral Zone A04, Asokoro District, otherwise known as No. 60, Kwame Nkruma Street, Asokoro, Abuja.

Addressing Justice Adeniyi Ademola of the Federal High Court, sitting in Abuja, Mr. Keyamo said prosecution witness 2, Mr. Sule, who is managing director of Tweenex Consociate H.D. Limited, telephoned him about 9.00p.m. on Monday, January 25, saying that the second son of the defendant, Emeka, visited his (Sule) office at Asokoro to inquire about his home address from some individuals.

According to Mr. Keyamo, the younger Ohakim allegedly approached three people, whose names he gave simply as Okon (a driver), Akpabor (a driver) and Shola (an architect), for information on Mr. Sule’s home address.

He said, ‘‘We don’t want to distract the court from this trial. But I thought it goes beyond the issue of counsel to counsel because it touches on the administration of justice and protection of the witness concerned.

‘‘We will apply, at this stage, that a word of caution and concern go out. If it repeats itself, we shall bring appropriate application before the court over the development.’’

However, in his response, lead counsel to the defendant, Chris Uche, SAN, expressed shock at what he described as Mr. Keyamo’s outburst, saying the matter should have been discussed at another gathering rather than in the open.

According to him, ‘‘I have no doubt that what the prosecution has said amounts to destabilizing the defence. Keyamo had been sitting directly behind us for more than one hour before the case was called, but he didn’t raise the matter. He also saw the defendant eyeball to eyeball when he came to our seats, yet he didn’t discuss the matter. Now, it is on the Internet and it will be in the press tomorrow.’’

The defence counsel, who further urged the court to dismiss the story as unfounded, said the prosecution could file an application on the matter as he had mentioned to the court.

After listening to both counsel, Justice Adeniyi, who was visibly disturbed about the allegation, said there was no harm if the prosecution had hinted the defendant and his counsels about the incident.

‘‘I am a bit disturbed. It is a very serious allegation. We can’t deny the fact that it also touches on the defendant himself. Alternatively, you could have asked to seek audience with me in chambers in the presence of the defence counsel and the defendant,’’ he said.

The defence counsel further told the court that the prosecution failed to handle the matter properly, adding that his action was not in consonance with a traditional belief that says an elder should report any act of misconduct by a child to his father.

In his reaction, Mr. Keyamo said, ‘‘I find it extremely objectionable. He has said things about my person, whereas I have never said anything about him. I will not treat an issue of threat to life in private! There is no rule of legal practice that says such an issue should be discussed in private. It depends on my judgment.’’

Consequently, Justice Ademola adjourned the case to Wednesday, January 27 for continuation of trial.

All rights reserved. This material and any other material on this platform may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, written or distributed in full or in part, without written permission from PREMIUM TIMES.


  • amazing2012

    What keyamo did is good because it is from getting witness address to assassinating the witness. We have seen witnesses to powerful get killed.
    Now the witness will at least for now and the open statement move free.
    The witness is surely protected in this way !

    • AFRICANER

      This is perhaps, the third time I’ve read Keyamo deploy this trick now, in less than a year, obviously the probative value of branding a defendant as dangerous in front of the very arbiter upon which his fate lays, is far, far outweighted by its prejudicial effect; and Keyamo should not only be admonished for this, but sanctioned; the Court is NOT his father’s parlor. The court is their as a fact finder, and should be able to look at the entirety of the defendant’s life, both incriminating, and mitigating, should sentencing be required; it’s preposterous to introduce, without giving opposing counsel an opportunity to object, incidents that have nothing to do with an instant case. If Keyamo wishes to testify as a witness, he should resign as a godamm special prosecutor, get on the list, get sworn in, get on the witness box, and be subject to cross examination!

      • chukshaifa .

        Grammar, thief na thief

  • favourtalk

    Another fools in this country and what s shame in Nigeria as they steal too much of Nigeria. That is how much they nearly destroyed this country. What a shame to Nigeria PDP party that nearly destroyed this country

  • PROMOPROMO1

    (+2348039385114**PROMO!!!*PROMO!!!*PROMO!!!*PROMO!!!%% BUYA BAG OF
    DANGOT3XECEMENT IN A VERY LOW RATE @ some of #1,000 per BAG, AND WE
    DELIVER TO ANY PART OF THE COUNTRY UPON THE CUSTOMER(S)ORDER, HURRY UP,
    AND CALL THE DIRECTING MANAGER (MR BALOGUN) TO place an order…. HURRY
    up to BENEFIT from it BEFORE thE PRomo END’S:::::.and your goods will be!