U.S. Green Party files for votes recount, raises $4.5 million

Photo credit: ListSurge
Photo credit: ListSurge

The Green party candidate in the U.S. presidential election, Jill Stein, has announced that the party would file for a recount of votes in the battleground states of Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania.

Ms. Stein, who suspected electoral fraud in the election, said the recount would check the accuracy of the machine-counted vote tallies in these states in order to ensure the integrity of the election.

The Stein/Baraka Green Party Campaign launched the votes recount funding effort on Wednesday.

By Thursday, Stein/Barak campaign had already raised about 4.513, 852. 23 million dollars , more than the target of 4.5 million dollars needed to file the recount cost for two of the states, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin and pay the fees for lawyers.

Ms. Stein, who is leading the campaign, said between six and seven million dollars would be needed to cover the entire costs including filing for recount in the third state-Michigan.

The deadline for filing for a recount in Wisconsin is Friday, at a cost of 1.1 million dollars, while the filing fees and deadlines for Pennsylvania and Michigan respectively are 0.5 million dollars by Monday and 0.6 million dollars by Wednesday.

The Stein/Baraka campaign, along with election integrity advocates, have embarked on massive fundraising effort to obtain the needed funds before Friday afternoon.

“Congratulations on meeting the recount costs for Wisconsin! Raising money to pay for the first round so quickly is a miraculous feat and a tribute to the power of grassroots organising.

“Now that we have completed funding Wisconsin’s recount (which is due on Friday), we have begun to tackle the funding for Pennsylvania’s recount (due Monday).

“Then we will focus on raising funds for Michigan’s recount (due Wednesday),” Stein said.

NAN reports that there have been concerns over the credibility of the election in the battleground states where Hillary Clinton lost to Donald Trump by about one per cent.

The concerns have also heightened recently as Clinton’s lead over Trump in popular votes has surpassed 2 million as additional votes are being counted in the presidential election.

If the elections are recounted and results found to have been compromised, it could affect Trump’s election due at Electoral College on December 19.

In U.S., where the difference between two candidates is 0.5 per cent or less, government funds the recount but where it is more than one per cent, the recount is funded by the filing candidate.

“After a divisive and painful presidential race, reported hacks into voter and party databases and individual email accounts are causing many American to wonder if our election results are reliable.

“These concerns need to be investigated before the 2016 presidential election is certified. We deserve elections we can trust,” Ms. Stein insisted.

The Stein/Baraka campaign had noted that the election was surrounded by hacks adding, the use of systems that have been demonstrated to be easily hacked should concern every American.

“Some of the machines used in Wisconsin, have been banned in California after they were shown to be highly vulnerable to hacking and malicious reprogramming, due to the lack of security features.

“Leading election security experts have been calling for exactly this sort of recount as a critical safeguard against cyber-attacks.

The Green Party Platform called for “publicly-owned, open source voting equipment and deploy it across the nation to ensure high national standards, performance, transparency and accountability”.

It also called for the “use of verifiable paper ballots; and institute mandatory automatic random precinct recounts to ensure a high level of accuracy in election results”.

“Election integrity experts have independently identified Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin as states where “statistical anomalies” raised concerns.

“Our effort to recount votes in those states is not intended to help Hillary Clinton.

“These recounts are part of an election integrity movement to attempt to shine a light on just how untrustworthy the U.S. election system is,” it said.

NAN recalls that Trump had won the Nov. 8 presidential election based on Electoral College while Clinton, who lost the election, led Trump by over two million popular votes as at Wednesday.

(NAN)


DOWNLOAD THE PREMIUM TIMES MOBILE APP

Now available on

  Premium Times Android mobile applicationPremium Times iOS mobile applicationPremium Times blackberry mobile applicationPremium Times windows mobile application

TEXT AD:Dr Dan,Suggest 5 Ways to Satisfy Your system and Last up 25Min In Bed When Having Sex, Click Here...


All rights reserved. This material and any other material on this platform may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, written or distributed in full or in part, without written permission from PREMIUM TIMES.


  • Emeka

    Exercise in futility! If you like, count the entire vote cast, Trump would still be the winner…

    • John

      Oh! Emeka, you just wrote what I had in mind. Please tell whoever that man is to send the money down to us.

      • princegab

        US is not like Africa bro, these are serious people. The electoral college vote is yet to be certified. The college is useful when election results are neck to neck not when one has over 2 million votes than the other.

    • Sir Demo

      Yibos never cease to amaze. Trump will decreed Biafra republic? Or order expedite US visa issuance to Igbos over other Africans? Senseless bunch of hatefull louts!

  • Gerald Okoduwa

    Russia may have hit Obama below the belt to hijack America. The likes of Edwin Snowden are still with them.

  • Watch man

    Jill Stein (or is it stain) is a Clinton agent that wishes to stain the election credibility. This has never been done in Wisconsin’s POTUS election history. It will fail. Let the crybabies continue their cry.

    • Sir Demo

      He cost Hillary in some states actually!